Skip to main content

Why is success measured by estimates?

http://blog.cutter.com/2008/11/04/software-estimation-a-tough-beast-to-control/

This article was posted under a quoted title "“a tough beast to control”. I agree with the title but 100% disagree with the survey. Meeting estimates IS all about "control." If you want to meet an estimate you have to give the customer exactly what you agreed and control (Deny) any changes they want.

Here is an analogy which is similar to one Robert Martin used. You go to your doctor and they say you have a tumor in your liver.(arbitrary organ). They schedule the surgery and open you up. While removing the tumor they find another one in your pancreas .(arbitrary organ).
Using estimates as a measure of success would encourage the doctor to sow you back up, let you heal and then say, we did not estimate the pancreas tumor so we could not remove it because we would exceeded our estimate by 10%. Also, I will not get my bonus if we do that and you might not pay for it.

The doctor is more successful by removing the additional tumor. It cost less to do it while the patient is already under and is open at the table. He is also more successful because he helped the patient more than originally planned.

I am not saying estimates are not important. They are important to create a schedule but success should be driven by the value to the customer not random numbers.

As leaders we must work to set customer expectations regarding success. I would like the survey to review how well the customer expectations were defined and managed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2020 State of DevSecOps by Accurics

 This is an excellent report for all IT Pros and Engineers.   Highlights: Storage is most impacted solution Open security groups or network configuration Secrets are not so secret Unused resources are not secure. Take a look at these.  Look again.  These are not highly skilled problems.  They just need guidelines and proactive management.  The article uses policy as code as a solution for many of the problems.  I will drill into each of these more in the future.  I wanted to get the awareness out first and then, come back to solutions.  

Manage IT by Johanna Rothman

I just completed this book. I think it is a really good book which covers a whole lot of software development. This book could possibly be the best book for first time project managers. I believe many of the PMs understand PMM but do not understand software development. This book gives a view of each project role. The only one that it does not cover is Business Analyst or requirements documentation. It does cover QC, development and of course PMs. It gives a PM a view into development processes like TDD, CI and estimation. Many PMs that are new to SD can read this book and get a great start to manager an SD project. If you are a PM or know some, read this book. http://www.jrothman.com/

Matrix Organizations are bad for Software Dev

Development teams need to be teams first and company people second. What happens when your team wants to start using user stories and index cards, but your analyst team manager thinks Use Cases are the best way to document requirements? How about when your QA process is not mature and you keep releasing with defects but the QA manager does not do anything about it? How about your project manager never buys into the team and only cares about being on time and on budget because their review is based on it. Maybe the tech lead wants requirements that never change and never lets the client change their mind. The technical manager taught your tech lead and agrees with everything the tech lead says. Agile or what I like to call "Successful Teams" are teams. They do what it takes to do what the customer wants, deliver features. I am not saying only agile teams are successful but successful teams are agile. If your organization is matrix, get your leadership buy in to override...