Skip to main content

Change is scary or is it?

DevOps is about continuous improvement.  Sometimes changes are easy and everyone loves them.  You implement them quickly and everyone is happy.  Sometimes people hate the change and it dies.  Most of the time it is a combination of fans, skeptics and who cares.
How should you present changes you are passionate about?  Here are some steps to successfully proposing changes.

1. Start with the goals your are trying to achieve.  Unless your goals are way off base, people usually can't argue with goals that make the future better.
2. Present solutions to the goals as a "recommendation".  Who knows, someone may have a better idea or improvement in your change.
3. Draw a picture, workflow, diagram or something that you can show people.
4. Watch your audience to see who is getting your message and who are not.
5.  Ask who understands the resolution.  Don't ask if anyone has questions or who doesn't get it.  Ask a question that makes people get involved.
6.  Finally ask for feedback, ask if anyone else needs to provide input and what are next steps.

Now the fun part.  If you want to build up credibility, you need to quickly implement the changes so everyone sees you are serious.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2020 State of DevSecOps by Accurics

 This is an excellent report for all IT Pros and Engineers.   Highlights: Storage is most impacted solution Open security groups or network configuration Secrets are not so secret Unused resources are not secure. Take a look at these.  Look again.  These are not highly skilled problems.  They just need guidelines and proactive management.  The article uses policy as code as a solution for many of the problems.  I will drill into each of these more in the future.  I wanted to get the awareness out first and then, come back to solutions.  

Manage IT by Johanna Rothman

I just completed this book. I think it is a really good book which covers a whole lot of software development. This book could possibly be the best book for first time project managers. I believe many of the PMs understand PMM but do not understand software development. This book gives a view of each project role. The only one that it does not cover is Business Analyst or requirements documentation. It does cover QC, development and of course PMs. It gives a PM a view into development processes like TDD, CI and estimation. Many PMs that are new to SD can read this book and get a great start to manager an SD project. If you are a PM or know some, read this book. http://www.jrothman.com/

Matrix Organizations are bad for Software Dev

Development teams need to be teams first and company people second. What happens when your team wants to start using user stories and index cards, but your analyst team manager thinks Use Cases are the best way to document requirements? How about when your QA process is not mature and you keep releasing with defects but the QA manager does not do anything about it? How about your project manager never buys into the team and only cares about being on time and on budget because their review is based on it. Maybe the tech lead wants requirements that never change and never lets the client change their mind. The technical manager taught your tech lead and agrees with everything the tech lead says. Agile or what I like to call "Successful Teams" are teams. They do what it takes to do what the customer wants, deliver features. I am not saying only agile teams are successful but successful teams are agile. If your organization is matrix, get your leadership buy in to override...